PRO TIP when you face a Business Conflict

Collaborate, Don't Confront: In ADR, success lies in collaboration, not confrontation. Embrace open communication, actively listen, and work together towards a solution that benefits all parties involved.

Private Court Symbol
The International Court of ARBITRATION

News

Home - Media Centre - Newsroom - Supreme Court - Balancing...

Got any
Questions

Write to us

legal@privatecourt.in

Share this page

Supreme Court - Balancing CPC Principles and Section 9 Power in Interim Relief

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India addressed the interplay between Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). The court held that while exercising its powers under Section 9, it cannot ignore the basic principles of the CPC. However, the court clarified that it is not bound by the provisions of the CPC. Furthermore, the court emphasised that the power to grant interim relief under Section 9 is broader than the powers granted to a court under the provisions of the CPC. This article analyses the case of Essar House Pvt Ltd v. Arcellor Nippon, delving into the court's reasoning, its implications, and the broader significance of this ruling..
Background of the Case:

The case of ''Always Remember Properties v. Reliance Home Finance Limited'' revolved around a dispute between two business entities regarding the interpretation of a complex arbitration clause in their commercial contract. One party contended that the matter must be resolved through arbitration, as stipulated in the agreement, while the other party disagreed and sought resolution through regular litigation in a civil court.

As per the A&C Act, Section 11 grants the High Court the authority to appoint arbitrators in cases where parties are unable to agree on the same. The Court's role under this section is essential, as it facilitates the initiation of the arbitration process, which is a fundamental aspect of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms.

Ruling of the Court:

In this landmark ruling, the High Court of Delhi elucidated the nature of its power under Section 11 of the A&C Act. The Court emphasized that the power exercised by the High Court in such instances is of a judicial nature, and not administrative. This distinction holds immense importance as it impacts the Court's ability to review orders passed under Section 11.

The Court further clarified that the judicial review under Section 11 is limited to cases where there is an evident factual error. The Court will not reevaluate the merits of the decision or the correctness of the conclusion reached by the designated authority. Instead, the focus remains on factual accuracy, specifically if an incorrect statement by either party's counsel influenced the order passed.

Implications and Significance:

The High Court's ruling in ''Always Remember Properties v. Reliance Home Finance Limited'' carries several implications for the arbitration landscape in India, and they are as follows:

  • Strengthening Judicial Oversight: By classifying the power under Section 11 as judicial, the Court has reinforced the significance of its oversight in matters of arbitration. This move enhances the credibility of the arbitration process and assures parties of fair and impartial adjudication.
  • Curbing Potential Abuse: Designating the power under Section 11 as judicial and allowing judicial review for evident factual errors serves as a safeguard against potential abuse of the arbitration mechanism. It prevents parties from securing favorable appointments through misrepresentation or manipulation.
  • Clarity in the Arbitration Process: The ruling brings much-needed clarity to the process of appointing arbitrators. By defining the scope of judicial review, parties can better understand the limitations and expectations when seeking relief under Section 11 of the A&C Act.
  • Boosting Confidence in ADR Mechanisms: A robust arbitration framework is essential for attracting foreign investments and fostering business growth. This judgment reinforces India's commitment to a stable and predictable ADR regime, which, in turn, can bolster investor confidence.
  • Impact on Arbitral Institutions: The ruling may have an impact on arbitral institutions as well, as parties may now seek the intervention of the High Court if they believe there was an evident factual error in the appointment of arbitrators.
Inference:

The High Court of Delhi's ruling in the case of ''Always Remember Properties v. Reliance Home Finance Limited'' marks a significant milestone in the evolution of arbitration law in India. By clarifying that the power under Section 11 of the A&C Act is judicial in nature, the Court has strengthened the framework for alternative dispute resolution in the country. The ability to review orders under Section 11 based on evident factual errors ensures that parties can trust the process and have confidence in the fairness of arbitration proceedings.

We can say, this landmark judgment emphasizes the High Court's role as a guardian of justice in arbitration matters. It upholds the integrity of the arbitration process and underscores India's commitment to a robust ADR regime. As the nation continues to position itself as an attractive destination for investments and business ventures, a well-defined and reliable arbitration framework becomes increasingly essential. This ruling is a step in the right direction towards achieving that goal.

Reference Case:

''Always Remember Properties v. Reliance Home Finance Limited'' -