PRO TIP when you face a Business Conflict

Craft Clear Agreements: When an agreement is reached, ensure it's crystal clear. Clearly articulate the terms, responsibilities, and consequences. Clarity prevents future disputes and lays a solid foundation for cooperation.

Private Court Symbol
The International Court of ARBITRATION


Got any

Write to us

Share this page

Non Govt. Pvt. Finance Company V Business Owner

Date of Claim raised: 10/08/2023
Date of Conciliation: 21/08/2023
Date of Settlement: 21/08/2023
Digest: Mediation/Conciliation/Dispute/Claimant/Respondent/Invoice/Settlement
Case Summary

In the bustling lanes of Trikuta Nagar, Jammu, a non-government finance company, "The Claimant," registered since 1997, found itself in a monetary tangle. Their dispute revolved around a substantial sum of Rs. 74,820/- owed by "The Respondent," a business individual from Malakhera, Alwar, Rajasthan. The non-payment of this amount led to a legal standoff. Seeking resolution, both parties turned to PrivateCourt, a trusted conciliator. This case study delves into the intricacies of this dispute, the conciliation process, and the ultimate settlement, demonstrating how PrivateCourt's intervention led to an amicable agreement.

The Issue:

The heart of the dispute between the Claimant and the Respondent was multi-faceted, rooted in a complex web of financial transactions and strained relations.

Firstly, the Claimant asserted that they had diligently provided a range of financial services to the Respondent, meticulously abiding by the terms and conditions agreed upon in their contract. However, the Respondent allegedly failed to meet their obligation of making timely payments, thereby resulting in a substantial outstanding sum of Rs. 74,820/-. This nonpayment was the primary source of contention.

Adding to the complexity, secondly, the Claimant contended that they had made numerous attempts to communicate with the Respondent, issuing repeated reminders and formal notices to request the settlement of the outstanding dues. These communications seemingly went unanswered, and the Claimant perceived this as a lack of willingness on the part of the Respondent to fulfill their financial obligations, further escalating the dispute.

Thirdly, the Claimant highlighted the adverse financial repercussions they suffered due to the nonpayment. This included not only financial losses but also operational disruptions, which exacerbated their grievances. The financial strain endured by the Claimant as a result of The Respondent's nonpayment added a layer of complexity to the dispute.

Lastly, but perhaps most significantly in the broader context, the deteriorating business relationship and the erosion of trust between the two parties compounded the dispute. The breakdown in trust had far-reaching consequences, not only impacting the current dispute but also potentially hindering any future collaborations or interactions between them.

These four interwoven reasons collectively fueled the dispute, creating a complex scenario that required astute mediation and resolution, ultimately leading to the involvement of PrivateCourt as a trusted third-party conciliator.

The PrivateCourt Proceedings:

PrivateCourt, renowned for its adept handling of disputes, swiftly initiated the conciliation process. They began by sending formal notices to both parties, urging them to submit all relevant documents pertaining to the case. These documents underwent meticulous vetting to ensure the veracity of claims. PrivateCourt followed a protocol designed to be unbiased, impartial, and fair.

The seasoned Sole Conciliator from PrivateCourt scheduled a Conciliation meeting via Zoom and audio conference calls, adhering to the Notice of Conciliation. During this session, the Claimant and the Respondent engaged in constructive discussions, demonstrating their willingness to amicably resolve the dispute. Subsequently, the Respondent informed PrivateCourt of their intent to settle the matter amicably.

The Settlement Agreement:

In accordance with Section 73 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a comprehensive Settlement Agreement was meticulously drafted and entered on 21st August 2023. This legally binding document outlined that the Respondent agreed to pay the settled amount of Rs. 74,820/- to the Claimant on or before 20th September, 2023.

Furthermore, it stipulated that any future claims or disputes arising from this settlement would be resolved through e-arbitration as per PrivateCourt's rules, ensuring a streamlined and efficient resolution process.

The Inference: This case serves as a prime example of PrivateCourt's efficacy in mediating disputes. It highlights the importance of open communication and a willingness to find common ground. The amicable settlement not only resolves the financial disagreement but also paves the way for rebuilding trust and fostering better business relationships. It underscores the significance of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in swiftly and efficiently resolving conflicts, ultimately benefiting all parties involved.